John
O'Brien, CSSp
Pathways for the Church in Pakistan
Christian
praxis includes both action and reflection. Taking time to pause for
reflection and evaluation is an essential element in any ecclesial journey.
All the more so if a Church and the culture which surrounds it tend
towards activism. By the same token, open-minded planning is an essential
element in receptivity to the designs of providence. There are several
indicators that the Church in Pakistan has reached that stage in its
development where an overview and evaluation of the present situation
is a necessary step in planning future priorities. Under God's grace
it has much to rejoice in - although naturally, one of the things it
would also wish to rejoice in is a willingness to be challenged to new
initiatives, priorities and values. (The celebration of the Silver Jubilee
of the Pastoral Institute in Multan and the publication by the Pakistan
Episcopal Conference of the report "Changing Realities" represent
two important attempts to read the signs of the times in relation to
the future directions and priorities of the Church in Pakistan. There
have been several other developments too - mostly, though not always
of a positive nature - which demand our attention and evaluation. Worthy
of mention is the renewal of interest in and commitment to various forms
of adult catechesis as well as the growing awareness that more appropriate
methods need to be found for the disbursement and evaluation of development
aid. These events are first and foremost an invitation to dialogue and
further reflection. The Second Millennium of the Incarnation - to be
celebrated in the universal Church as a Year of Jubilee - invites a
similar reflection: a taking stock; an act of repentance and hope; an
opening of our collective mind and heart to the action of the Holy Spirit.
Part of this repentance and openness is an intellectual conversion aimed
at freeing our minds from inadequate or false assumptions, predispositions
and priorities; and part of this intellectual conversion is the willingness
to evaluate the status quo. The latter is the main focus of this
article). Over the previous generations much has been achieved; or to
rise above the language of success and failure, we can say that God
has been faithful to his people here in Pakistan and the question may
now be posed as to how we - in the on-going journey - may be faithful
to God.
We
may begin by attempting a first approximation at delineating some of
the more obvious characteristics of the life of the Church here. Since
the Church is a community which at one and the same time rejoices in
the living presence of the Spirit of God and is permanently open to
reform and renewal, we will attempt to describe both the "light"
and the "shadow"; the positive and the negative. The willingness
to do both together is an act of mature self-acceptance; neither evading
reality nor manipulating it. Our readiness to deal in reality is an
aspect of our rootedness in God who is Al-haq!
A) Strengths:
The
Church which under God's grace, has come into being here in Pakistan
has many fine qualities and strengths:
i.
It continues to exist and grow in a non-Christian and non-supportive
environment:
ii.
It is very much a Church of the poor, God's chosen ones:
iii.
It is engaged in an on-going and far-reaching practical ecumenism:
iv.
It is a Church with a profound religious sensibility:
v.
There is a growth in local vocations to ministry:
vi.
At all levels it is socially involved; both "religiously"
and "developmentally":
vii.
It has a highly developed organisational infrastructure:
viii.
Among the People of God there is a tangible love for "The Word":
xi.
The Church membership has retained a strong cultural identity: the Church
in Pakistan is very much a Pakistani Church.
x.
The communities have a very strong identity as "Christians"
xi.
Among Pakistani Christians there is a very solid sense of family and
kinship.
xii.
There is a strong devotional life with many indigenous resources; songs,
pilgrimages, Marian meals etc.
This
is the light; if there is light there is also shadow!
B)
Shortcomings:
i.
At nearly all levels, the Christian community can be easily divided
by the factionalism (partibazi) which characterises social relations
and by the consequences of other internalised oppression:
ii.
It is a Church massively reliant on foreign money:
iii.
It is constantly under threat externally and internally from fundamentalism
and sectarianism:
iv.
The Liturgy has been translated but not inculturated:
v.
There is an impoverished Eucharistic sense:
vi.
A dependency mentality is still very stong:
vii.
Politically, psychologically and even physically it tends to be ghettoised:
viii.
The culture is consolidated but seldom critiqued by ecclesial praxis
and therefore not sufficiently enriched by faith:
ix.
In general terms, the leadership remains authoritarian or patenalistic,
reinforcing the dominant socio-political pattern rather than offering
an evangelical alternative to it:
x.
The dignity and role of women are scarcely recognised:
xi.
There is little or no missionary outreach:
xii.
It mirrors the society in that personal freedom and responsibility are
not really valued above conformity.
C)
Creative Tension
Because
of the constant dynamic interchange between these sometimes complementary
and sometimes divergent currents there are several points of creative
tension in the life of the Church. Christian hope invites us to see
these as points of creativity, inventiveness and growth: a call to become,
in a more profound way, the community which is the sign of God's universal
salvation in this present historical moment of the journey to freedom
of the people of Pakistan as a whole.
For
the purposes of facilitating further development of these ideas, I would
now like to juxtapose these 12 attributes each with its light and shadow.
What can emerge is a matrix of creative tension which can be the springboard
for a programme of renewal.
CULTURE:
FUNCTIONALITIES AND DYSFUNCTIONALITIES:
a)
The Church will continue to exist and grow - mostly through the natural
growth in the existing Christian population - which for demographic
reasons is quite considerable. In its mentality and actions however,
it is a microcosm of the surrounding culture with all the latter's vigour
and vitality, as well as its dysfunctionalities. Our capacity to name
the latter in an exercise of socio-cultural analysis needs to be matched
by a capacity to observe how the Christian community tends to internalise
them. (Socio-cutlural analysis can be difficult and demanding. The clearest
indication of the strength and success of the socialisation process
is how few people are capable of critiquing it. This holds true for
just about every culture. It is an irony that people can be immensely
proud of their culture - and justifiably so - and at the same time keenly
aware of the injustice and violence in their society; and yet fail to
see the connections between the two. For poverty, injustice and oppression
persist not only because of the socio-economic structures which perpetuate
them but also - and of equal importance - because of the cultural patterns
which legitimate and transmit them. The inculturation of the Gospel
includes the process of discovering in a given culture, the seedbed
for a new and dynamic expression of the Christian faith; but equally,
since all cultures institutionalise and legitimate a power structure,
it includes the process of critiquing and transforming aspects of that
culture in the light of ethical imperatives revealed in the living out
of the Gospel). Because of the very particular history of socio-political
oppression and marginalisation of our people, the internalisation of
this oppression can give rise to pathologies with a consequent propensity
towards horizontal violence that can run deep. The cultural reinforcement
of these patterns can give rise to a form of oppression which in its
own way is just as life-denying as the consequences of feudalism or
militarism. At the same time this realisation needs to be tempered by
taking cognisance of the fact that in the struggle against long-standing
oppression, people in general adapt the only survival techniques available
to them and that in turn, consolidates their attachment to them.
TRANSFORMATION OR DEPENDENCY:
b)
By and large our Church is blessed through being rooted in the life
of the poor and oppressed, and their struggle for dignity and equality
and the transformation of society to which this points. The fundamentally
feudal nature of society however - intensified by the authoritarianism
of successive military dictatorships - as well as the internal colonialism
in the wider society have tended to divert this transformative potential
into an ever greater reliance on paternalism; and from an institutional
point of view, on donations of foreign money. Although on the surface,
the manner in which this is organised becomes ever more sophisticated
and less crudely a matter of person-to-person handouts, there is a growing
body of evidence to suggest that the basic pattern of dependency has
in fact been consolidated. This has resulted in even less readiness
to go down the road of self-reliance and transformative action.
In
speaking of a Church of the poor, we should not overlook the fact that
relative material prosperity among some sections of the Christian population
is producing a class division within the Church itself. To the extent
that the ostracising of groups like the families of sanitary workers
by the wider society is mirrored - and therefore intensified - by a
similar attitude among upwardly mobile Christians, serious questions
may have to be asked about the hidden presuppositions in much of the
Church's development programmes.
FUNDAMENATLISM OR CONTEXTUALISATION:
c)
Great honour is given to the Bible and compared with many older and
more developed Churches in other countries, there is real familiarity
with its text and message. There is a richness here which cannot be
overlooked. In fact it cries out to be contextualised and deepened.
The singing of the Psalms in Punjabi is a very distinctive and enriching
feature of church life here. Yet this esteem for Sacred Scripture could
be undermining of a real sense of Church inasmuch as it is conceived
in rather Islamic terms: there is an unspoken assumption (a false one)
that the Bible functions in Church life and theology as the Quran sherif
does in Islam. This leads to and is further exacerbated by the prevalence
of a literalist and fundamentalist reading and preaching of the text.
As a result, all sorts of self-appointed preachers abound, each offering
a more exotic explanation and application of the text. Rivalries increase
and with them, factionalism. There seems little sustained effort to
promote a communitarian reading of Scripture, contextualised on the
one hand, by the living tradition of the People of God and on the other,
by the concrete struggle for justice and dignity which is the daily
bread of our people.
Although
at the level of the people's ordinary life especially in the area of
marriage, there is a healthy practical ecumenism, there remains a serious
doubt as to whether this is leading to an enriching cross-fertilisation
among the different ecclesial communions. Rather, because of the overall
fundamentalist approach to Scripture and the multiplication of sects,
it may well be leading to a dilution of the ecclesial and sacramental
sense. The result, instead of being a sharing of the highest common
factor, may well be a reduction to the lowest common denominator. Moreover,
the signs are that this underlying emphasis on "the book"
- to be read privately at home - may have seriously diluted the perceived
importance of gathering precisely as "Church". What in principle
is an enrichment, may have become in practice an impoverishment of parish
and ecclesial life.
RELIGIOSITY OF FAITH:
d)
Anyone who has lived in a secularised society is immediately struck
by the deep religious feeling in our society as a whole and also among
our own people. This sense of the presence of God is not something to
be simply taken for granted but constantly purified and enriched through
spirituality. Yet as for example, the blasphemy laws indicate, strong
religious feeling can be ethically ambiguous. It is not necessarily
a measure of the faith that does justice and exercises itself in compassion
and spirituality. In his own time, Jesus was not so much promoting religion
in the face of irreligion, but purifying a religion caught up with the
maintenance of oppressive social and ideological structures; replacing
it with one based in spirit and truth, on an outreach to others in an
attitude of service, rooted in the universal compassion of God for all
his creatures.
In
the present situation in Pakistan, the Church should not make the mistake
of confusing religiosity with faith. Until the conventions of honouring
the name of God in words, customs and buildings is translated into a
willingness to reach out to our fellow humans and transcend our own
personal and family ambition, society may indeed be religious in a socio-cultural
sense, but the Christian concept of a faith expressing itself as love
has scarcely taken root.
The
question that arises here is the very one which has always faced the
people of the Bible: not "is there a God?" but "what
kind of god is God?" But this question arises not simply as an
academic exercise to be solved in the seminary classroom but as a concrete
project to be tackled in the way we structure our parish life and church
commitments, including our institutions. For the object of our faith
is not simply an omnipotent being whom we can supposedly beseech to
bless and approve our social and material ambitions; but an endless,
infinite love who empowers us to do justice to all as a way of sharing
that same love with which he first loved us.
VOCATIONS: NUMBERS OR QUALITY:
e)
There is a steady increase in vocations to the ministry of Sister
and Father; less steady in the case of religious Brothers and perhaps
a decline - at least in some Dioceses - in relation to the ministry
of catechist. Padri both self-appointed and officially nominated,
abound. Personnel as such is not a problem. Yet it would appear that
searching questions may have to be asked in relation to training, lifestyle
and ministerial approach. The traditional type of catechist may well
be in the process of becoming outmoded due to - among other factors
- a gradual rise in the standard of education among the Christian community.
On the other hand, there is unquestion-ably a need for full-time married
lay pastoral workers of high calibre and adequate preparation who would
be adequately remunerated.
If
there are questions to be asked about the training of catechists, there
are even more pressing ones with regard to the training of priests.
If the Church continues to depend - as, under present circumstances,
it almost certainly will - on a mainly presbyteral model of leadership,
then the intellectual calibre of the candidates for ordination as well
as their spiritual motivation and capacity to acquire pastoral vision
and skill, become issues of the utmost importance. While ordinations
are increasing, the expectation that the Church could be led and serviced
solely by local priests seems a long way from realisation because of
an uneven growth in the number of ordinations in the different Dioceses,
as well as the relatively significant numbers who continue to leave
the ministry for a variety of reasons. Since trends in other countries
make the assurance of a supply of presbyters from abroad somewhat problematic
- even if that were to remain desirable - the training of suitable local
lay people assumes even greater importance.
The
ministerial potential of Sisters, except in educational and medical
institutions, has scarcely been tapped. Sisters themselves need to search
for an engaged way of living and serving in the Church which does not
substitute the domesticity of "convent life" for the passionate
commitment of "religious life". Their role in catechesis needs
to be developed but in doing so, one needs to keep in mind that catechesis
is an art and a skill and is not automatically given to those who have
made religious profession. Virtually all religious congregations need
to address the tension in their institutes between availability for
the poor and the consolidation of their own institutes.
CONTROL OR ENABLEMENT
f)
Whereas Christians in other countries have often appeared to suffer
a deculturation process because of their conversion to Christianity,
in Pakistan the local cultural identity has remained very strong. The
particularly strong kinship patterns in Pakistani life afford a great
sense of identity and security as well as a support system both in times
of rejoicing and distress. Yet it may also be true that this incomparable
sense of belonging with its many very positive aspects that should not
be undervalued, also makes personal choice and a sense of personal responsibility
somewhat problematic.
In
various ways, the Church leadership at all levels, can be tempted to
go along unquestioningly with these cultural presuppositions for they
fit neatly into an authoritarian or paternalistic concept of authority
and leadership. This is especially clear in relation to women and younger
people. While this may make for simpler administration in the short
term, it will not develop a sense of personal commitment and responsible
service among the People of God and its leaders in particular.
The
dialogue between culture and faith is not always a straightforward business.
It is neither a case of submitting the indigenous culture to some supposedly
classic faith-based culture rooted in a different experience, nor is
it a matter of allowing the local cultural imperatives to be the judge
of what aspects of the faith may be considered to be acceptable and
life-giving. The relationship is much more dialectical and must include
in the light of Gospel values, an analysis of the power structure in
the local culture and an openness to critique of the cultural values
which legitimate it. This process has scarcely begun. Not to begin it
risks simply replicating this power structure in the organisation of
the Church itself.
ACCOUNTABILITY OR SECURITY:
g)
The Church in Pakistan is marked by a deep and enduring commitment to
integral human development. Through provision of land, schools, hospitals,
co-operatives, health programmes, youth movements and in countless other
ways, the Church has reached out to the whole person in community. It
has consistently avoided the alienation inherent in reducing the Gospel
to a "purely religious" message and has remained sensitive
and committed to the people in their struggle against poverty and exclusion.
The
particular way this commitment continues to be expressed has given rise
to a massive physical infrastructure so heavily dependent on external
funding, that even when the resources are fully in place, their maintenance
alone is beyond the financial scope of the Local Church - and if present
policies are continued, will always remain so. There are huge implications
here for the kind of Church we may wish to become and they have to be
recognised and faced. Moreover there seems to be little accountability
or evaluation either of the use of funds or even of the desirability
or otherwise, of many of the projects for which they are obtained. In
some cases, the organisation of this vast financial enterprise can exercise
such a hegemony over the local Diocese that pastoral, liturgical and
spiritual issues figure rather low on the real agenda. It may well be
that dealing with this state of affairs is the single biggest challenge
facing the Catholic Church in Pakistan at the present time.
There
is the distinct but related question of examining Church-run institutions
to see whom they serve and who benefits from them. It is by no means
obvious that providing resources for the privileged will result in justice
for the poor. At another level, the history of the Church in other countries
shows that the progressive institutionalisation of Church personnel
because of a greater and greater preoccupation with the maintenance
of buildings and financial systems, has a disastrous effect on the linkage
of Church ministers with the struggles of ordinary people. The result
can often be an institutionalised Church existing for its own functionaries,
leaving the people to find their own way in either popular devotionalism
or various strands of fundamentalism.
Because
of this over-involvement in institutions and the preoccupation of the
leadership with financial matters, catechetics and liturgy always take
second place to "development". An adult catechesis is not
developed; liturgy is not inculturated; the celebration of the sacraments
becomes minimalistic and perfunctory. The result can be a church of
brick and cement but not of believing, worshipping people.
GHETTOISATION OR WITNESS:
h)
Unquestionably, Christians in Pakistan are a marginalised minority.
While it might be an exaggeration to say that they are a persecuted
minority, it is nonetheless true that in a variety of ways, their rights
are scarcely respected. Indeed as the events of Shantinagar and Khanewal
indicate, and before that the murder of Manzoor Masih, they are in a
real sense, under threat: tolerated by but scarcely integrated into
society. On the other hand, the question that arises for the Church
and in a particular way, for the Church leadership, is what kind of
minority it wishes to be.
There
is great evangelical potential in being a minority for developing a
strong sense of identity and of differentiation from the surrounding
society and its values system - leading in turn to a ministry of witness.
On the other hand, there is the temptation to further consolidate the
sense of ghettoisation that already exists. The separate electorate
introduced during the dictatorship of General Zia-ul-Haq, is a case
in point. Very quickly certain power groups saw how their vested interests
could be promoted by collaborating with something that was introduced
as an instrument of marginalisation and disenfranchisement. After a
number of years the question arises as to; in what way if any, Christian
politicians are different from their counterparts in society at large.
If the emerging process is one of clientalism, opportunism and dependency
- all conducted on the basis of chai-pani - the very mirror image
of the dysfunctional politics in the society at large, then in what
way is it a leaven in the mass or a sign of an alternative society?
Some will argue that things simply cannot be otherwise but if that is
the case, then what is to be gained from simply going along with something
so fundamentally flawed?
The
very successful campaign on the issue of the religious clause in the
identity card when the proposed sectarian legislation was defeated by
grassroots action, illustrates the tremendous potential for identity
and self-respect that lies in peaceful and dignified campaigning for
what most people of goodwill immediately recognise as just and fair.
Could not the same be true for such issues as return of schools, the
teaching of Christian doctrine to Christian children in Christian schools,
an integrated electorate, repeal of offensive laws such as Hadood and
blasphemy ordinances?
EUCHARIST OR BIBLIOLATRY:
i)
A question that sorely needs to be tackled is how a Church with a deep
religious sense, rooted in a culture where various kinds of shared meals
are cultural imperatives, among a people with a strong devotional sense,
has been markedly unsuccessful in developing a strong Eucharistic tradition.
Up and down the country the Eucharistic celebration is characterised
by poor and sporadic attendance and participation, indifferent presidency,
liturgical texts not readily comprehensible, and an altogether inadequate
understanding of the catechesis involved.
When
the Church in Rahim Yar Khan was attacked some years ago the theft of
the Bible was continually bemoaned in various meetings all over the
country, but even in specifically Catholic circles, the desecration
of the Blessed Sacrament was scarcely mentioned.
Some
reasons for this underdeveloped sense of Eucharist are:
i.
the internalisation of the "religion-of-the-book" ideology;
ii.
the shortage of priests coupled with an apparent gap in the training
of catechists to conduct religious services which link up in various
ways with the Eucharist, leaving them to conduct ill-thought out and
unstructured "Bible services" in the style of Padri;
iii.
a non-inculturated liturgy which (a) scarcely draws on the religious
symbols in the local cultures and (b) presents a translation of the
Roman Missal which while literally accurate, is often beyond the comprehension
of many worshippers;
iv.
an on-going reduction in the real - as distinct from the notional -
importance attached to adult catechesis. This means that catechesis
ends with the preparation of children for first Holy Communion. This
preparation in turn, often consists largely in teaching them a certain
number of prayers and a few catechism answers and that is considered
to be the end of the matter. The fact that the Church in practice, allows
this situation to continue, reinforces in the people the impression
that Eucharsit is not in fact, a central feature of Church life and
Christian identity.
v.
a strongly verbalistic or logocentric catechesis as distinct from an
exploration of the symbolic world of the people.
vi.
the divorce between liturgy and the struggle for justice.
GROWTH OR STAGNATION:
j)
There is great potential in our Church. Three areas in particular are
worth mentioning (i) the ministry of women; (ii) the development of
a spirit of prayer, especially contemplative prayer and (iii) outreach
to people of other faiths.
In
areas such as participation in the Eucharist and in different kinds
of groups as well as the religious education of children and vocations
to the religious life, the strong Christian commitment of women is clearly
evident. Moreover there is growing evidence of a tacit or implicit openness
to the person of Jesus and the beauty of the vision of life he proposes,
among educated women of the majority community. Given these and many
other factors - among them basic justice and common sense - it has become
strictly necessary to involve women in the process of thinking out new
models of women's ministry in the Church.
While
prayer is hugely important in peoples' lives, many think of it as a
process of constructing ever longer and longer recitations replete with
high-sounding clichés. Many of our Church ministers especially
catechists, but also Fathers, seem to be copying this practice as if
"by their many words they may be heard" (Mt 6:7). There seems
little evidence of actually teaching people how to pray; teaching them
the value of silent communion with God.
The
Church leadership seems to forget that in the Sufi tradition - which
communicated the Islamic faith to the majority community - the emphasis
was on interiorised religious experience.
The
love people have for their faith barely translates into any effort to
communicate the joy of this faith to others whether non-Christians or
lapsed Christians. The Church does not exist for itself but for the
sake of its mission. Theologically, mission - rooted in the Trinitarian
life - is the prior reality. Remaining closed to mission and turning
in on oneself leads to stagnation and selfishness. Even in the outreach
to the Katchi Kohlis, Parkari Kohlis and Marwari-Bhils, the on-going
long-term commitment of local Church personnel is all too rare - although
there are some edifying examples. Local Church personnel who get involved
in this work rarely receive the encouragement they deserve and need
and are sometimes accused of abandoning "their own".
FOCI FOR RENEWAL AND ADVANCE:
The
truly great achievements of the past and present can launch us forward
in hope. Building on the resourcefulness and vitality of the present,
the challenges to be faced can be confronted with a sense of anticipation
and adventure. In particular attention will need to be paid to the following
areas of Church life.
i.
Education for personal and social transformation.
ii.
Building structures of growing self-reliance.
iii.
Teaching the Bible in its ecclesial and social transformational context.
iv.
Clearly communicating that membership of the Church is not only a means
of receiving but an opportunity to serve and develop a spirituality
of willing service.
v.
Recruiting and training of full-time lay pastoral workers or catechists
with a higher standard of education, a more clearly defined pastoral
and para-liturgical role and an adequate system of support.
vi.
Putting the dialogue between faith and culture onto the theological
agenda both in houses of theological formation and in the pastoral deliberations
of the Church leadership.
vii.
Devoting resources in a serious way to adult catechesis.
viii.
A renewed emphasis on the centrality of the Eucharist in Christian life
including catechesis, liturgical inculturation and para-liturgies with
its linkage to the struggle for justice and dignity.
ix.
Evaluating institutions and works primarily on the basis of how they
serve the poor.
x.
Setting realistic goals re. dependence on foreign money and growing
financial self-sufficiency.
xi.
Developing the ministry of women.
xii.
Building on and enriching the sense of prayer in the community through
teaching people deeper ways to pray, opening houses of prayer and becoming
a recognisably praying community.
xiii.
Missionary outreach - different to proselytism - to lapsed Christians
and peoples of other faiths.
(It
is only fair to point out that there are many fruitful and exciting
pastoral initiatives already underway encompassing some of the pastoral
directions outlined here. One thinks of the efforts at an inculturated
theology in groups like Mukhtaba-e-Anawim; the co-operative movement,
not least in the form it has taken among the Marwari-Bhils; the evidence
of a renewed commitment to catechetics in the various diocesan centres;
the growing awareness among women's groups; sung Eucharistic liturgies
in some parishes; the training for the transformation programme in Multan
as well as many prayer groups. One should also mention the work of justice,
the various campaigns for human rights often conducted in liaison with
progressive groups among the majority community; and in particular,
the efforts to organise and empower the sanitary workers. This is by
no means an exhaustive list. A very necessary task for the work of renewal
is to list these initiatives in a more complete way; to outline their
approaches and to evaluate their potential for renewal. Taken in concert
they may well represent the voice of the Holy Spirit for the future
of our Church).
CONCLUDING
REMARKS:
These
are the views of one person. Though necessarily limited in perspective
and scope, they are the fruit of involvement, initiative, observation
and dialogue; as well as much trial and error. By the nature of the
case they are partial and open to critique and amplification. They are
presented to facilitate discussion; in the form of an invitation to
move towards a degree of consensus as to where we are and how we should
like to move forward. Nothing remains the same and all things change;
to refuse to move forward is to stagnate. But that moving forward has
to be thoughtful, purposeful and spirit-filled.